Projects

Real work, in real contexts

We selected three projects that show how Sensory Engineering Lab enters people's lives — at home, at school and at work/study. Identifying details have been removed; the rest is exactly as it happened.

3Contexts covered
15+Materials applied
3-9Months of follow-up
Home

Regulation at the end of the school day

Context. Family with a 3-year-old child of school age. Sensory profile with low tolerance to auditory stimuli and high need for proprioceptive input on returning from school. This moment translated into consistent dysregulation episodes, affecting play and family leisure, sleep quality and staying through the dinner routine.

Request. Support the transition between returning from school and dinner / bedtime routines, reducing sensory overload without significantly altering family dynamics.

Intervention

  • Sensory profile assessment at home (Occupational Therapy)
  • Functional analysis of household spaces, focused on the living room and bedroom
  • Creation of a "calm corner" with a beanbag, weighted and textured toys, a heavy plush (Sensory Engineering Lab sloth) and a vibrating ball
  • Squishy bath toys and a textured body wash lotion
  • Removed hair-dryer use; preference for longer immersion baths
  • Introduction of metal cutlery with thickened handles
  • Medium-density elastic band on the dinner chair to promote movement and proprioceptive input
  • Removal of the high-chair with tray (limited movement, increased irritability)
  • Weighted blanket adjusted to the child's weight and bed size
  • Monthly follow-up for the first 3 months, with gradual strategy adjustment
  • In May, replacement of the weighted blanket with lycra sheets (sensory containment effect with thermal comfort)
Outcome

Immediate improvement in sleep quality, no night wakings or motor agitation during sleep. Visible reduction in dysregulation episodes during the pre-dinner period in the first 6 weeks. The family reported greater routine predictability, better anticipation of transitions and longer presence of the child in end-of-day family routines. Also reported: improvements in family play, sleep quality and dinner-time participation.

Talk about a similar case →
Home setting with a regulation corner. Calm corner · living room
School

School participation and self-regulation in the classroom

Context. 8-year-old child with Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD), Autism Spectrum (Level I) and Sensory Integration dysfunctions. Marked fine-motor difficulties, fatigue in prolonged graphic tasks and low tolerance to classroom ambient noise. Auditory-processing difficulties interfered with attention, school participation and remaining seated during desk tasks.

Request. Promote greater participation and autonomy in school, reducing the impact of sensory and motor difficulties on academic activities and self-regulation during class time.

Intervention

  • Functional assessment in the school context and articulation with the teaching team
  • Ear defenders for moments of greater noise and overload
  • Low-density elastic band on the classroom chair for regulating movement during sustained-attention tasks
  • Non-slip cushion on the chair for postural stability
  • 45° inclined plane on the work desk — better postural positioning and visuomotor organisation
  • Thickened low-density pencil
  • Triangular eraser for functional grip
  • Reading rulers for visual support and attention organisation
  • Adapter for whiteboard pen — participation at the board
  • Periodic follow-up with adjustments to materials and strategies
Outcome

Gradual improvement in staying with desk tasks and greater tolerance to the classroom's auditory context. The child began showing less fatigue during writing activities, increased participation in academic tasks and greater autonomy in using the adapted materials. Teachers and family reported improvements in self-regulation, in organisation during schoolwork and in the child's confidence in activities previously avoided.

Talk about a similar case →
Classroom with adapted sensory-regulation materials. Classroom · primary
University

Organisation and attention in higher education

Context. Young university student with ADHD, with significant executive-function difficulties — particularly in maintaining attention, organising and planning tasks. Frequently forgot manuals, notebooks and homework. Also showed increased need for sensory self-regulation during prolonged classroom periods.

Request. Promote greater autonomy in school organisation and improve attention maintenance during classes, reducing the functional impact of executive-function difficulties on academic performance.

Intervention

  • Functional assessment of school routines and organisation challenges
  • Digital notebook organised by folders matching the different subjects
  • Digitalisation of school materials — reducing what needs to be carried and forgotten
  • Weighted fidget toys, used on rotation and monitored to avoid sensory habituation
  • Chewing gum during classes as an oral-motor self-regulation strategy (agreed with the teaching council)
  • Balance cushion on the chair for discreet regulating movement
  • Fidget ring for self-regulation and attention maintenance
  • Thick weighted digital pencil with integrated chewing tip for oral-sensory input during writing
  • Multimodal phone reminders (vibration + flashlight) for anticipating and completing tasks
  • Educational measures: task flexibilisation, support with deadline management, early access to materials and regulating breaks
  • Periodic follow-up with progressive adaptation of strategies
Outcome

Gradual improvement in material organisation and reduction in the number of forgotten items. The young person began showing greater autonomy in managing subjects and greater capacity for attention maintenance during classes. Teachers and family reported increased school participation, better task completion and reduced fatigue associated with academic demands.

Talk about a similar case →
University student with self-regulation strategies and materials. University · higher education
Note

About the anonymity of the projects

We work with sensitive people and contexts. The projects described are real; names, identifiable photographs and detailed locations have been removed out of respect for the families and organisations involved. When we publish identified projects, it will always be with informed consent and prior review.

Have a case that looks like one of these?

Every situation is unique, but we recognise patterns. Tell us your context, we may have already responded to something similar.